A brief post to keep you thinking.  Have you noticed that official economic numbers always show a rosy outlook on the date the information is announced to the public… THEN a few weeks later the data is “adjusted”  and it is always adjusted downward except in the case of unemployment.  Do you recall the announcement that 286,000 were hired in April, well that’s not quite the case, they missed it maybe 50,000 or so.  We should all be pleased that there is any hiring at all, it sure beats a year ago when 500,000 a month were losing their jobs.

Have you noticed the market ran back up early this year to the best gain its seen in years, then suddenly dropped in May 2010 to leave us with the worst performing market month since the depression.

Have you noticed the turmoil in Europe with Finland, Iceland basically bankrupting last summer. Few noticed since those are small economies, but everyone noticed Greece and now everyone is worried about Spain and Portugal.

Have you noticed the countries in the worst shape are the countries that make promises they cannot keep, certainly that they cannot afford to keep. They are also countries with the largest number of government employees and where people can retire on full pay at age 50 years old.  Get that…Full Pay, Retired at 50.   Those numbers do not work , they are not actuarily sound no matter where you live you cannot fund people in full retirement at full pay for 30-40 year life span.  Ludicrous.

Bottom line is the whole world got too greedy.  Spent too much, promised too much, lived too high on money we didn’t earn, went deep in debt, didn’t save for a rainy day and guess what?   It’s time to pay and its going to be ugly for awhile.

Last week I spoke to a friend who is an astrologer.  This lady is rock solid, intelligent and well read on many subjects. She is a former school teacher and is in process of writing a book on how to be sure your children get an excellent education.  We were speaking of this long drawn out  economic downturn…. “are you listening” …..pay attention to this…. she said, the alignment of the planets which began early last friday am (May 28) has not happened in 84 Years!  84 years ago we were about to begin the Great Depression.  Although there will be subtle changes, this alignment will last 7 years as it did 84 years ago. (1926-1933) .   Astrologers are calling this a new awakening when the people of the world become aware and take action across the planet.  It is called to last 7 years until  things settle down.

Personally, I never paid much attention to astrology, but my friend has told me too many things that are absolute fact that she interpreted from astrological charts. I’m starting to pay attention. Whether Economics or Astrology, I believe we’re in for a rough ride for the next several years.  Slash your debt to the bone, get used to living on much less, increase savings dramatically, keep cash available and put investment into companies with ‘must have’ products that will pay a good dividend.

Those out of work and still struggling to feed the family…it’s time to re-invent yourself.  America’s greatness was her entrpreneurial spirit, freedom and independence.   We’ve been lulled into corporate slavery, with the promise of a regular paycheck,  health care benefits and a guaranteed pension at retirement!  How’s that working for millions of families today?  Long term promises to be delivered in the future are just too unrealistic and in the meantime freedom, independence and true  innovation are stiffled while people are relegated to corporate or government dependency.

Now, go about doing something to change all that.  Au revoir

 

Is There Good News on the Horizon?

Friends,

Shame on me for not attending to this blog for several months. The good news is I was engaged in productive income earning activities (not a JOB, mind you!).

In the past few months we’ve seen the stock market rally, home sales are improving slightly and inflation seems to be in check, but what is missing?  You guessed it….JOBS!  Fundamentally there is zero improvement in jobs.

Just when the administration began to brag about job creation , the applications for unemployment jumped again.   this simply means people came out of the woodwork looking for work again.  Admittedly layoffs have slowed down to 25,000 – 50,000 month which sure beats the 250,000 monthly we were seeing yet there is still no “net new hiring” all factors considered.  To fully recover from this unemployment we must see 100,000 new jobs per month minimum for a period of five years. That would get us back to almost normal unemployment. Thats not going to happen.

Not only America, but the whole world is in an economic slow down brought on by years of excess spending by individuals and governments alike.  Finland and Iceland led the way last summer.  Most didnt notice as they are so small. They noticed Greece however.  Spain and Portugal are right behind Greece.

Word is that China is the next to face a massive slow down.  Since any numbers from China are suspect anyway, due to government manipulation [hmm, sounds like the US government], the smart money says China must rein in its inflation and may be facing a bubble burst like the U.S.   China already quit buying U.S. debt because they dont trust our economy as they used to trust it.  No wonder , with the current administration US debt to income will be slightly behinds Greece’s before their failure.

If it appears I’m off the subject of Jobs, Employment and Careers, I’m really not.  Simply a slight diversion to validate that the world economy is slowing so the jobs needed are fewer and fewer.   Today I can get certain jobs done for $2-3.00 hour that cost me $8-10.00 hr in America due to a global economy and technology.

I will close for now with two thoughts.  First , prepare yourself for a global economic slowdown that affects everyone except the most wealthy.  Secondly, seriously rethink how you make your money and to alternative income sources instead of a job. Many people I know have multiple streams of income so not one thing will take them down.  Its’ a good time for soul searching as to how to support yourself and family.

For months my partner and I have been experimenting with different techniques for survival (income wise).   Soon we hope to share some of our tips with you.   In the meantime, thanks for reading and pay close attention to these changes and how they affect your lifestyle.

 

Economists Fear Recovery Will Leave More Behind Than in Past Recessions

Readers, this article by Peter Goodman, writing for the New York Times was so thorough in fact, yet so personal as he tells the story through the mouths of those going through joblessness, I just had to reprint it in its entirety here.

By Peter S. Goodman

updated 6:15 a.m. ET, Sun., Feb. 21, 2010

BUENA PARK, Calif. – Even as the American economy shows tentative signs of a rebound, the human toll of the recession continues to mount, with millions of Americans remaining out of work, out of savings and nearing the end of their unemployment benefits.

Economists fear that the nascent recovery will leave more people behind than in past recessions, failing to create jobs in sufficient numbers to absorb the record-setting ranks of the long-term unemployed.

Call them the new poor: people long accustomed to the comforts of middle-class life who are now relying on public assistance for the first time in their lives — potentially for years to come.


Yet the social safety net is already showing severe strains. Roughly 2.7 million jobless people will lose their unemployment check before the end of April unless Congress approves the Obama administration’s proposal to extend the payments, according to the Labor Department.

Here in Southern California, Jean Eisen has been without work since she lost her job selling beauty salon equipment more than two years ago. In the several months she has endured with neither a paycheck nor an unemployment check, she has relied on local food banks for her groceries.

She has learned to live without the prescription medications she is supposed to take for high blood pressure and cholesterol. She has become effusively religious — an unexpected turn for this onetime standup comic with X-rated material — finding in Christianity her only form of health insurance.

“I pray for healing,” says Ms. Eisen, 57. “When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got to go with what you know.”

Warm, outgoing and prone to the positive, Ms. Eisen has worked much of her life. Now, she is one of 6.3 million Americans who have been unemployed for six months or longer, the largest number since the government began keeping track in 1948. That is more than double the toll in the next-worst period, in the early 1980s.

Men have suffered the largest numbers of job losses in this recession. But Ms. Eisen has the unfortunate distinction of being among a group — women from 45 to 64 years of age — whose long-term unemployment rate has grown rapidly.

In 1983, after a deep recession, women in that range made up only 7 percent of those who had been out of work for six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. Last year, they made up 14 percent.

Twice, Ms. Eisen exhausted her unemployment benefits before her check was restored by a federal extension. Last week, her check ran out again. She and her husband now settle their bills with only his $1,595 monthly disability check. The rent on their apartment is $1,380.

“We’re looking at the very real possibility of being homeless,” she said.  Every downturn pushes some people out of the middle class before the economy resumes expanding. Most recover. Many prosper. But some economists worry that this time could be different. An unusual constellation of forces — some embedded in the modern-day economy, others unique to this wrenching recession — might make it especially difficult for those out of work to find their way back to their middle-class lives.

Labor experts say the economy needs 100,000 new jobs a month just to absorb entrants to the labor force. With more than 15 million people officially jobless, even a vigorous recovery is likely to leave an enormous number out of work for years.

Some labor experts note that severe economic downturns are generally followed by powerful expansions, suggesting that aggressive hiring will soon resume. But doubts remain about whether such hiring can last long enough to absorb anywhere close to the millions of unemployed.

A new scarcity of jobs
Some labor experts say the basic functioning of the American economy has changed in ways that make jobs scarce — particularly for older, less-educated people like Ms. Eisen, who has only a high school diploma.

Large companies are increasingly owned by institutional investors who crave swift profits, a feat often achieved by cutting payroll. The declining influence of unions has made it easier for employers to shift work to part-time and temporary employees. Factory work and even white-collar jobs have moved in recent years to low-cost countries in Asia and Latin America. Automation has helped manufacturing cut 5.6 million jobs since 2000 — the sort of jobs that once provided lower-skilled workers with middle-class paychecks.

“American business is about maximizing shareholder value,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at the research firm Decision Economics. “You basically don’t want workers. You hire less, and you try to find capital equipment to replace them.”

During periods of American economic expansion in the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, the number of private-sector jobs increased about 3.5 percent a year, according to an analysis of Labor Department data by Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute, a research firm. During expansions in the 1980s and ’90s, jobs grew just 2.4 percent annually. And during the last decade, job growth fell to 0.9 percent annually.

“The pace of job growth has been getting weaker in each expansion,” Mr. Achuthan said. “There is no indication that this pattern is about to change.”

Before 1990, it took an average of 21 months for the economy to regain the jobs shed during a recession, according to an analysis of Labor Department data by the National Employment Law Project and the Economic Policy Institute, a labor-oriented research group in Washington.

After the recessions in 1990 and in 2001, 31 and 46 months passed before employment returned to its previous peaks. The economy was growing, but companies remained conservative in their hiring.

Some 34 million people were hired into new and existing private-sector jobs in 2000, at the tail end of an expansion, according to Labor Department data. A year later, in the midst of recession, hiring had fallen off to 31.6 million. And as late as 2003, with the economy again growing, hiring in the private sector continued to slip, to 29.8 million.


It was a jobless recovery: Business was picking up, but it simply did not translate into more work. This time, hiring may be especially subdued, labor economists say.  Traditionally, three sectors have led the way out of recession: automobiles, home building and banking. But auto companies have been shrinking because strapped households have less buying power. Home building is limited by fears about a glut of foreclosed properties. Banking is expanding, but this seems largely a function of government support that is being withdrawn.

At the same time, the continued bite of the financial crisis has crimped the flow of money to small businesses and new ventures, which tend to be major sources of new jobs.

All of which helps explain why Ms. Eisen — who has never before struggled to find work — feels a familiar pain each time she scans job listings on her computer: There are positions in health care, most requiring experience she lacks. Office jobs demand familiarity with software she has never used. Jobs at fast food restaurants are mostly secured by young people and immigrants.

If, as Mr. Sinai expects, the economy again expands without adding many jobs, millions of people like Ms. Eisen will be dependent on an unemployment insurance already being severely tested.

“The system was ill prepared for the reality of long-term unemployment,” said Maurice Emsellem, a policy director for the National Employment Law Project. “Now, you add a severe recession, and you have created a crisis of historic proportions.”

Fewer protections
Some poverty experts say the broader social safety net is not up to cushioning the impact of the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Social services are less extensive than during the last period of double-digit unemployment, in the early 1980s.

On average, only two-thirds of unemployed people received state-provided unemployment checks last year, according to the Labor Department. The rest either exhausted their benefits, fell short of requirements or did not apply.

“You have very large sets of people who have no social protections,” said Randy Albelda, an economist at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. “They are landing in this netherworld.”

When Ms. Eisen and her husband, Jeff, applied for food stamps, they were turned away for having too much monthly income. The cutoff was $1,570 a month — $25 less than her husband’s disability check.

Reforms in the mid-1990s imposed time limits on cash assistance for poor single mothers, a change predicated on the assumption that women would trade welfare checks for paychecks.

Yet as jobs have become harder to get, so has welfare: as of 2006, 44 states cut off anyone with a household income totaling 75 percent of the poverty level — then limited to $1,383 a month for a family of three — according to an analysis by Ms. Albelda.

“We have a work-based safety net without any work,” said Timothy M. Smeeding, director of the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. “People with more education and skills will probably figure something out once the economy picks up. It’s the ones with less education and skills: that’s the new poor.”

Here in Orange County, the expanse of suburbia stretching south from Los Angeles, long-term unemployment reaches even those who once had six-figure salaries. A center of the national mortgage industry, the area prospered in the real estate boom and suffered with the bust.

Until she was laid off two years ago, Janine Booth, 41, brought home roughly $10,000 a month in commissions from her job selling electronics to retailers. A single mother of three, she has been living lately on $2,000 a month in child support and about $450 a week in unemployment insurance — a stream of checks that ran out last week.

For Ms. Booth, work has been a constant since her teenage years, when she cleaned houses under pressure from her mother to earn pocket money. Today, Ms. Booth pays her $1,500 monthly mortgage with help from her mother, who is herself living off savings after being laid off.

“I don’t want to take money from her,” Ms. Booth said. “I just want to find a job.”

Ms. Booth, with a résumé full of well-paid sales jobs, seems the sort of person who would have little difficulty getting work. Yet two years of looking have yielded little but anxiety.

She sends out dozens of résumés a week and rarely hears back. She responds to online ads, only to learn they are seeking operators for telephone sex lines or people willing to send mysterious packages from their homes. She spends weekdays in a classroom in Anaheim, in a state-financed training program that is supposed to land her a job in medical administration. Even if she does find a job, she will be lucky if it pays $15 an hour.


“What is going to happen?” she asked plaintively. “I worry about my kids. I just don’t want them to think I’m a failure.”

On a recent weekend, she was running errands with her 18-year-old son when they stopped at an A.T.M. and he saw her checking account balance: $50.

“He says, ‘Is that all you have?’ ” she recalled. “ ‘Are we going to be O.K.?’ ”

Yes, she replied — and not only for his benefit.

“I have to keep telling myself it’s going to be O.K.,” she said. “Otherwise, I’d go into a deep depression.”

Last week, she made up fliers advertising her eagerness to clean houses — the same activity that provided her with spending money in high school, and now the only way she sees fit to provide for her kids. She plans to place the fliers on porches in some other neighborhood.

“I don’t want to clean my neighbors’ houses,” she said. “I know I’m going to come out of this. There’s no way I’m going to be homeless and poverty-stricken. But I am scared. I have a lot of sleepless nights.”

For the Eisens, poverty is already here. In the two years Ms. Eisen has been without work, they have exhausted their savings of about $24,000. Their credit card balances have grown to $15,000.

“I don’t know how we’re still indoors,” she said.

Her 1994 Dodge Caravan broke down in January, leaving her to ask for rides to an employment center.

She does not have the money to move to a cheaper apartment.

“You have to have money for first and last month’s rent, and to open utility accounts,” she said.

What she has is personality and presence — two traits that used to seem enough. She narrates her life in a stream of self-deprecating wisecracks, her punch lines tinged with desperation.

“See that,” she said, spotting a man dressed as the Statue of Liberty. Standing on a sidewalk, he waved at passing cars with a sign advertising a tax preparation business. “That will be me next week. Do you think this guy ever thought he’d be doing this?”

And yet, she would gladly do this. She would do nearly anything.

“There are no bad jobs now,” she says. “Any job is a good job.”

She has applied everywhere she can think of — at offices, at gas stations. Nothing.

“I’m being seen as a person who is no longer viable,” she said. “I’m chalking it up to my age and my weight. Blame it on your most prominent insecurity.”


Two incomes, then none
Ms. Eisen grew up poor, in Flatbush in Brooklyn. Her father was in maintenance. Her mother worked part time at a company that made window blinds.

She married Jeff when she was 19, and they soon moved to California, where he had grown up. He worked in sales for a chemical company. They rented an apartment in Buena Park, a growing spread of houses filling out former orange groves. She stayed home and took care of their daughter.

“I never asked him how much he earned,” Ms. Eisen said. “I was of the mentality that the husband took care of everything. But we never wanted.”



By the early 1980s, gas and rent strained their finances. So she took a job as a quality assurance clerk at a factory that made aircraft parts. It paid $13.50 an hour and had health insurance.

When the company moved to Mexico in the early 1990s, Ms. Eisen quickly found a job at a travel agency. When online booking killed that business, she got the job at the beauty salon equipment company. It paid $13.25 an hour, with an annual bonus— enough for presents under the Christmas tree.

But six years ago, her husband took a fall at work and then succumbed to various ailments — diabetes, liver disease, high blood pressure — leaving him confined to the couch. Not until 2008 did he secure his disability check.

And now they find themselves in this desert of joblessness, her paycheck replaced by a $702 unemployment check every other week. She received 14 weeks of benefits after she lost her job, and then a seven-week extension.

For most of October through December 2008, she received nothing, as she waited for another extension. The checks came again, then ran out in September 2009. They were restored by an extension right before Christmas.

Their daughter has back problems and is living on disability checks, making the church their ultimate safety net.

“I never thought I’d be in the position where I had to go to a food bank,” Ms. Eisen said. But there she is, standing in the parking lot of the Calvary Chapel church, chatting with a half-dozen women, all waiting to enter the Bread of Life Food Pantry.

When her name is called, she steps into a windowless alcove, where a smiling woman hands her three bags of groceries: carrots, potatoes, bread, cheese and a hunk of frozen meat.

“Haven’t we got a lot to be thankful for?” Ms. Eisen asks.

For one thing, no pinto beans.

“I’ve got 10 bags of pinto beans,” she says. “And I have no clue how to cook a pinto bean.”

Local job listings are just as mysterious. On a bulletin board at the county-financed ProPath Business and Career Services Center, many are written in jargon hinting of accounting or computers.

“Nothing I’m qualified for,” Ms. Eisen says. “When you can’t define what it is, that’s a pretty good indication.”

Her counselor has a couple of possibilities — a cashier at a supermarket and a night desk job at a motel.

“I’ll e-mail them,” Ms. Eisen promises. “I’ll tell them what a shining example of humanity I am.”

This article first appeared as Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs in The New York Times.

Copyright © 2010 The New York Times

Tagged with:
 

Last post I introduced 3 additional reasons our US economy doesn’t favor the return of traditional jobs: 1) Immigration 2) Cap and Tax, and 3) TARP.   I explored the Immigration aspect in some length, deferring Cap & Tax and TARP until the next posts which I will do in the next few days.

More compelling is summary data from a special section on the Economy in the Wall Street Journal Dec 21st .  Titled “The Dimming of a Beacon”, the article highlighted 3 critical economic/wealth factors ( Personal Income, Net Worth, Employment) over the past 60 years.

You will be shocked at how poorly our economy has performed in the first decade of the new millenium.  Take a look below:

2000                            2009                      % Change All Previous Decades  Beginning in 1950

Personal Income                      $37,449                      $39,447                   + 5.3 % Personal Income Grew 16% – 35% in previous decades

Net Worth                                      $200,077                  $173,684                  -13.19% Net Worth Grew from 10% -42% in previous decades

Employment 123,267,000            124,500,000 + 1 % Employment Grew from 20-35% previous decades

Look at the last statistic on Employment as it doesn’t tell the whole story.   During the decade of 2000-2009, US Population Grew by 35 million people yet employment increased only 1,233,000 to 124,500,000.  If we added 35M folks and only 1.23M jobs have been added, what happened to the others?  You got it….they’re unemployed.  We have 25,500,000 unemployed which is 17% of the workforce.  Not a good trend for the decade.

Many of us thought times weren’t so good yet we didn’t realize how poorly the whole decade has performed overall.

When you look at the facts shown above and the infrastructure changes in our economy its no wonder we have 17% unemployment (not 10% quoted by the Feds) which means one out 5 ½ people are out of work. No wonder our income hasn’t grown in the past decade, no wonder our wealth is eroding.

All these facts are discouraging yet intelligent creatures that we are, armed with the facts can figure out what they need to do in order to survive and thrive.

Many are turning to self employment. In 2008, 5% of unemployed turned to self-employment. In 2009 this number increased to 9%. This is a good sign that an increasing number of people realize they must change to survive.

What about you?  Have you lost income or lost a job?  Has your wealth declined. Odds are one or more are true or you wouldn’t be reading this. As we move forward with this coloum I will cover what some creative people are doing to stem the negative tide affecting their finances.

Until then, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!


 

We have seen a moderate slowing in the number of people losing their jobs in America, yet I believe much of this is seasonal in nature and expect  those numbers to reverse by January accelerating the downward trend.

My initial blogs addressed  “7 Reason the US Economy no Longer Favors Traditional Employment”, which you can still read below.  Since the original writing a few months ago, 3 more reasons have made themselves obvious and I will discuss below.

3 More Reasons Traditional Employment is Challenged in the U.S. include:

>Immigration

>“Cap & Tax” (aka Carbon Credits/Taxes)

>TARP and government bailouts)

Today we will explore Immigration including some of the less well known and rarely discussed issues surrounding why Immigration has had such a dramatic effect on structural unemployment in the US.   Cap & Tax and TARP will be covered in subsequent blogs.

1) Immigration

Adding immigration as a category isnt a political comment as to whether it is good or bad for America, nor is it based on any attitude about immigrants from any nation in particular.  This commentary is simply based on facts.

Immigration laws were dramatically relaxed in the 1960’s.  The result was moving from a very restrictive policy of allowing only 100,000 or so a year into America to a virtually unlimited number.  It appeared to be the right thing to do as our legislators voted with their heart to do the right thing by offering the American Dream to hundreds of thousands from other countries.  The strange part is protectionism was in place to make it difficult for highly skilled workers to come to America, yet laborers could migrate to our shores without restriction. The thought being that the educated worker might compete for the “good jobs” and put educated Americans out of work.

We all know what happened. The flood gates were now open as America received with open arms almost anyone that wanted to migrate to the Land of Liberty.   Concurrent with relaxing immigration laws came Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society (aka, the beginning of the social welfare state that we know in America today).  The Motivation was worthy,  the Math has become unaffordable.

What Congress created in the 60’s was a dramatic expansion of the ‘welfare state’, offering it not only to the poor already in America but also to anyone would wanted to move here and remained in the poverty level.  Essentially we opened our shores to those that were less productive (severely limiting the number of educated workers allowed to migrate to America) and rewarded the less productive with all sorts of free services including education, health care, etc.

Since the 60’s our economy has grown dramatically and prospered. Growth and Prosperity masked the problem and fuzzied up the math adequately so that no one paid attention until this extended economic recession kicked in.  As a nation we are now face to face with the reality that the US will no longer be the fastest growing nation in the world and in the near future will drop from the lofty position as the leading economic engine on this planet.  China, Indian and other Asian countries are taking over our previously envied position.

So what does Immigration have to do with Jobs in America? We all know the basic answer to that question.  An immigrant willing to work for less money takes a job away from an American worker. Pretty basic, right?  Well, not really.

Here’s the broad picture. Immigrants from wherever come to America both legally and illegally.  Legally, no problem, right?  Illegally, big problem, right?  WRONG on both counts!   How can that be?   Just because an immigrant arrives legally doesn’t mean they are a fully productive member of society….remember how America severely restricts the number of educated and professional people immigrating to American yet welcomes manual laborers.

Lets say for definition purposes that ACCEPTABLE IMMIGRATION means the immigrant and family are productive members of society earning a living by performing legitimate and accountable work and pay all their bills.  In other words they are NOT a drain on society. Of course that is exactly the case much of the time where immigrants are here legally and live by the rule of law and are honest, hard working, tax paying members of society.

Here’s the rub. Even immigrants here legally and certainly those here illegally typically perform tasks that pay ‘under the table’.  Where do we find immigrants usually working?  They work in service industries (food service, construction, agriculture, landscaping) where it is common to pay cash without any accounting or record reported to the government.  They can be paid much less than a documented legal worker who has Social Security, Medicare, Federal and State Income taxes paid…oh yes, and maybe even deductions for some healthcare program and maybe even a 401K, although these are fare in those industries.  The magnitude is massive.  If you work for traditional wages or salary, your tax deductions on the low end can be 28% in the least taxed states and 35% + in California.  Remember this is just taxes at the LOWEST tax bracket without personal deductions for 401K or healthcare. In the higher tax brackets the rate will exceed 50% yet this rate doesn’t affect many immigrants.

The result of all this is simple, yet tragically destructive to our overall economy and job growth in general.  America opens it’s immigration arms welcoming the low paid worker to do the jobs ‘no one else will do’.  [this is also a fallacy as the jobs were being done prior to opening the floodgates to immigration].  Low skill yet hard working people come to America for the better life. They flock to jobs paying under the table which are never accounted for officially, therefore NO Social Security taxes , No Medicare, No Federal, State or Local taxes are paid into the system, yet the states deliver the services to these people anyway and the cost is paid by the existing worker in a documented JOB where taxes are automatically deducted.

California is the Poster Boy (State) for the detrimental affects of massive  open immigration. It is simple math.  Add millions of people to your state who pay no taxes, mandate by state law that these people have rights (even though they pay no taxes and may be here illegally) to all the services of the state including health care, free college educations, other social services, continue to raise their benefits, increase taxes on those that are accountable to pay for the ’shortfall” and simply continue the process.

The result is the state of California (and we are using California as the best example however this is happening across the US in all states) because of its proximity, growth, climate and availability of low paying jobs for immigrants becomes an increasingly powerful magnet drawing not only legal immigrants, then illegal immigrants, then downright criminals because that’s where the money is (just like John Dellinger said about the banks…he robbed them because that’s where the money is).  the criminals commit their crimes against their own people because they are easy targets.

By now you believe this is a diatribe against immigration and I’ve forgotten my primary topic of how immigration affect US employment in a manner greater than the obvious which has already been discussed.

What happens after the obvious displacement of an indigenous local worker (who was accountable and paid taxes) by an immigrant (who is not accountable & not paying taxes) is FIRST , the Employer enjoys increased profitability because his labor cost drops and his administrative costs too. So this immigration policy gains support from the industries that use this labor and they CLAIM they cant get anyone to work other than immigrants (has always been the claim since America was founded AND Immigrants did build this country).  So the policy continues, favoring immigration and big business.  Where has the American worker gone in all this?  Hopefully they have found another industry or gone to college and have moved up the employment food chain, somewhat insulated from the onslaught of immigration.

But here’s the DIRTY LITTLE SECRET.  Taxes have continued to increase to cover all the free services from the increasing millions demanding those services who are not paying for them.  Individual income taxes rise (state and local), property taxes go sky high, business taxes increase, and all sorts fo new fees are tacked on to cover for the out of control welfare state which has reached crisis proportions simply because there are too many being served that pay nothing for their service.  The TAX BURDENS become so overwhelming, individuals and business leave the state in frustration and for their very financial survival.  So the PAYORs leave  but the RECIPIENTS remain still demanding their FREE SERVICES.   When the companies leave or go out of business, the local workers lose their jobs. The jobs have been driven away because the businesses were driven away by unfair taxation designed to provide welfare for millions of non paying participants.

Outsourcing was one of the original 7 Reasons I wrote about months ago.  Immigration correlates to Outsourcing from the standpoint that in the beginning Immigration seems to be a way to keep jobs at home in America.  However the fact is those jobs went to immigrants not Americans. When the tax and service BURDEN becomes so great due to the true costs of immigration, either the employer: A) Goes out of business, or B) outsources the work to another country, or C) moves the business to a more tax /business friendly State.

You may say you can’t move food and agricultural workers away from the farms and restaurants!  Yet you would be wrong.  How much Califonia produce do you see today compared to 20 years ago?  Same for Florida produce?  American companies have set up farm operations in other nations for guess what reasons?   LOWER LABOR COST (even lower than paying cash to immigrants in America) and LOWER TAXES in non-developed countries.  Why are Fast Food restaurants on the rise and sit down dining declining in America.  One reason is LABOR COST.

Truly Immigration has been a dramatic reason for the demise of traditional employment in America. Once those jobs go away, they dont come back EVER.  The Immigration factor is the same analogy as Unionization in terms of how jobs were driven from America…permanently.

As I develop the other factors in subsequent blogs you will see how jobs are being lost at all levels including unskilled labor, skilled labor and professional / managerial.  No level, No job, No Career is immune from these fundamental infrastructure shifts in the US Economy.

Soon, I will report on how to deal with such massive changes in our work lives and how these changes can actually help you face the future boldly and succesfully.

Before it’s too late…Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays

 

The article below was written by Gene Koprowski for Newsmax.  It quotes Nouriel Roubini who was a Clinton Economic Advisor and is a professor at NY University.

What I find interesting is that Roubini states much of the same as I’ve been saying for months regarding true unemployment , underemployment (where people are not fully emplyoyed 40+ hours per week) , and the biggest comment that up to 25% of our jobs can be fully outsourced today.

Read my “7 Reasons US Economy does not Favor Traditional Jobs” in prior posts.

Now let’s see what Gene Koprowski wrote quoting Roubini.

Many American investors may think the worst of the economic downturn is over, but they are completely wrong, writes Clinton administration economist and NYU professor Nouriel Roubini.

“Conditions in the U.S. labor markets are awful and worsening,” writes Roubini in The New York Daily News.

“While the official unemployment rate is already 10.2 percent and another 200,000 jobs were lost in October, when you include discouraged workers and partially employed workers the figure is a whopping 17.5 percent.”

Though losing 200,000 jobs per month is a bit better than the 700,000 jobs lost in January, job losses still average more than the per month rate of 150,000 during the last recession.

Job losses will last until the end of 2010, until well after the next general election, Roubini says.

“Remember: The last recession ended in November 2001, but job losses continued for more than a year and half until June of 2003; ditto for the 1990-91 recession,” writes Roubini.

The long-term outlook for workers and is even worse than current job loss numbers suggest.

As a way of sharing the pain, many firms are telling their workers to reduce hours, take furloughs and accede to lower wages.

“That fall in hours worked is equivalent to another 3 million full time jobs lost on top of the 7.5 million jobs formally lost,” writes Roubini.

“This is very bad news but we must face facts. Many of the lost jobs are gone forever, including construction jobs, finance jobs and manufacturing jobs.”

Recent studies suggest that a quarter of U.S. jobs are fully can be outsourced over time to other countries.

[2009 Newsmax, All Rights Reserved]

 

Read the Headline and be amazed.  After October layoff numbers were announced and the official rate of unemployment was raised to 10.2%, another phrase slipped out of the mouth of Federal officials.  That phrase was that Unemployment may remain at 10% for the next decade!  Our wise leaders are finally admitting we may be in a jobless economic recovery.  

This week they dropped another silent bomb buried in the back pages of the Wall Street Journal. Full Employment has always been considered to be between 4-5% .   This number takes into consideration that at any given time some people will be between jobs and this number it about as good as it ever gets [yes,  during the 1990's economic boom, we did see a 3.5% unemployment rate for a while, however that is really rare].   Guess what the new numbers are?  Yep, the reference to Full Employment is now between 5-6%.  That one point difference in range accounts for 1,500,000 unemployed.  Once again we have an example of governmental bureaucracy at work.  Dont like the facts, change the numbers or change the interpretation.

Here’s the facts, althought 10.2% equates to 15,300,000 out of work, the number doesnt count the underemployed (temporarily flipping burgers until they find a new job as heart surgeon), nor the ones who have dropped off the roles because their benefits ran out, or who simply dropped out and gave up.  Add those up and the data suggests 17.5% Un/Underemployed which is 26,250,0000.  Thats a lot of folks…nor Great Depression…but the most this country has ever seen since then.

So what’s our government going to do about it?  Well, the President is holding a meeting at the White House of business, union, think tank, leaders so they can talk about it! Goody. In other words he nor his administration don’t have a clue.  They speak of another stimulus package added on top of the other two that didnt work.  The administration claims to have created jobs by the hundreds of thousands yet the reporting verifies they arent very good at arithmetic. Did you see the project  that received $76,000 of stimulus money and the reporting claimed over 450 jobs were created!  Was that 450 jobs at a one time payment of $168?   Or was that 22 hours of minimum wage work for 450 people?  Others have claimed to have ’saved’ thousands of jobs due to stimulus money, yet there is no official defination so far of “saved jobs” , nor how to account for such.  Bottom line is a bunch liars puffing up reports so it appears the stimulus money is working which it isnt. Stimulus money is not creating jobs.

The CEO council which met this week reported their members are soft on hiring. They guys in charge of american business say they have no desire to hire.  According to this group, who should know, the market is soft, gains are likely to be temporary based upon recently lowered inventory and labor costs and they will be very cautious about adding back labor. Most claim to have trimmed as much as 15% of their labor costs over the past couple of years.  Take a close look at that number….most american businesses claim to have cut labor by 15%.   If thats true then the economy would experience a 15% increase in unemployment recently.  Add that to the base rate of 4-5% unemployment and you can see why the economy is in the tank.  The barrons of industry have No Desire to Hire, it only runs up their operating costs.

These business leaders realize they will face higher taxes, more punitive regulation, more intrusive oversight which all costs money. What they will  spend money on is lawyers & lobbyists to fight these changes while the poor slob on the factory floor or in middle management is axed to fund these higher paid roles defending the companies from onerous taxes and regulation.  Yes, there will be some winners, but it wont be the average Joe.

If you want more details read below where I explain ” 7 Reason US Economy No Longer Favors Traditional Jobs”.  This is precisely the reson it is the perfect time to start your own business, particularly a small home based business. More on that later.

 

Don’t get the impression that I take pleasure in “I told you so” comments, particularly about a subject that brings so much pain to so many people.  Bottom line is the supposedly recovering economy is a farce to somewhere between 15,000,000 to 22,000,000 people who are unemployed or underemployed.  Unemployment continues to rise even though the stock market is up and factory productivity is up!  Its not supposed to work that way. By the time these indicators improve (sales and productivity), layoff’s should have stopped and hiring should have re-started.  Not this time!

Early this week the Feds announced that the United States is officially out of the Great Recession simply because we had one month of positive numbers in consumer sales and factory productivity!   Yet on Thursday (pretty much obliterated by the news of the massacre at Ft Hood) Feds announced another 190,000 job losses in October raising official unemployment to 10.2%.  Government forecasts predicted only 175,000 October job losses, but they missed that call like they’ve missed every prior month this year.

The explanation for why its happening this way can be found in my prior blogs (below),  “7 Reasons US Economy Doesn’t Favor Traditional Employment”

Why do I write all these ‘doom and gloom’ predications?  My mission is to advise you what I see evolving for America and to warn of a dramatically changing economy and how to cope.   So far, I havent provided much in the way of coping advice however I will begin to do so shortly. Self employment and entrepreneurship is at an all time high.  Mostly driven by not having jobs of course, and that is precisely the point….when good job prospects aren’t abundant, people turn to themselves to survive.

The very same influences that are changing the US economy to be unfavorable to traditional jobs, are positively influencing the entrepreneur.  Technology and the Global Economy are two of the biggest reasons entrepreneurs can be succesful much more easily today that ever before.

I will continue to keep you abreast of the economy and employment trends AND I will begin to comment on alternatives for survival and success in the New US Economy.  As the unemployment roles grow, many who have set out on their own, forgetting traditional employment, are doing just fine independently.

Till next time.  [Please see prior blogs below for a full explanation of the influences on the US Economy and how these are permanent changes]

 

This is a time when I would have rather been wrong predicting continued rises in unemployment, unfortunately I was right. Why do you care?  Unless gainfully Self Employed everyone should care because there is no logical reason to expect unemployment numbers to return to an acceptable level of less than 4.5% in our lifetime.

Despite a stock market rise of 25% in the third quarter, the largest single quarter rise since the end of the Great Depression, we have continually rising unemployment now at 9.8% and this is the official number which is much lower than reality. This phenomenon of dramatic stock market improvement without jobs improvement supports the prediction by some economists that the U.S. will have a ‘jobless economic recovery.”  Looking at the economic data supports this new prediction of “jobless recovery” and bodes poorly for those already unemployed or fearing unemployment.

Official government forecasts called for a turnaround in unemployment this month, instead we have 263,000 more layoffs in September raising total reported unemployment to 15,100,000 marking a 26 year high. The official national rate rose to 9.8% at the end of September.  Fourteen states exceed 10% with manufacturing states such as Michigan seeing over 14% and some cities (Detroit) greatly exceeding 20%.

More critical than these widely reported numbers are the traditionally unreported numbers. 571,000 people left the labor force in September. Of these 571,000 people only 263,000 are reported as newly unemployed. For whatever reason, these 308,000 people are no longer in the work force.  They may have resigned voluntarily, been fired (not eligible for unemployment) or may have retired. Using these numbers unemployment would be 10.2%.

This recession began officially in January 2008 when unemployment stood at 4.9%.  The average length of a recession in America has been 13 months. So far we’re at the 20 month mark and still counting.  As long as unemployment continues to rise we’ll remain in a recesion. Over 5,000,000 people have been unemployed for over a year. In other recessions virtually no one was unemployed over six months. Using this data we know that 1 of 6 Americans are “un” or “under” employed.  I know of a former Coca Cola Vice President who is now a shift supervisor at a fast food restaurant!  Talk about Under-Employment! These situations are much more common than you might imagine.

When you consider the length of this recession which is not abating, the sheer number of unemployed which is still climbing and the fundamental economic shifts in the U.S. economy     [see blog dated Sept 11] along with economic forecasts of a ‘jobless recovery’, its easy to see how the expectation of  a traditional jobs recovery is likely unfounded.

These facts provide the basis for my strong encouragement that people look to ‘non traditional employment’, meaning Self Employment, independent contracting, building multiple streams of income as a basis for survival in the future.

As we continue to track the economy, in particular jobs erosion, we’ll introduce alternatives we’ve found to traditional employment for financial survival.  Stay tuned to take charge of your future.

 

Georgia State University’s Economic Forecasting Center published their much awaited annual Forecast in August.  Look carefully at what they predicted for Job Growth (#3 below).

1.  The recession is abating and economic recovery is on the horizon.

2.  Slow but steady growth in most economic sectors will begin in 2010 with more notable increases in 2011.

3.  Job growth will be the slowest area to recover but is predicted to add 100,000 jobs a month in 2011.

Let’s do the math. 15,000,000  to 25,000,000 people are out of work.  We’ll use the official government number of 15M.  Currently there are 240,000 advertised job openings.  When filled that leaves 14,760,000 still unemployed.  If jobs dont recover till 2011, and we add 100,000 jobs monthly in 2011, that’s 1,200,000 jobs added by Dec 31, 2012,   Unemployment will still be 13,560,000 people looking for work and likely having been unemployed most of 2009, 2010 and 2011. 

Who can survive three years of unemployment?  What good is this stimulas package doing for anyone but the big bankers, insurance companies and auto companies and their executives? 

If YOU are UN-employed, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO TO CHANGE THE OUTCOME?   A “JOB” isn’t the answer in todays economy.  A ”JOB” isn’t even the answer today IF you have one because everyone is at risk of job loss for the seven reasons I outlined in blogs #2 and #3.

May I encourage you to assess your situation right now.  Take Action to secure your future now.  Assuming a traditional JOB will always be there for you is a bad assumption.   Figure out what you do well, figure out what you like to do, what’s your passion.  Once you know that figure out how you can make money at it.  For assistance Tweet Me  [ http://twitter.com/alsauvageau] .